yep...as nature intended
Your (naturally) cheating, deceiving heart
By: Jonathan Hanson
Posted: 1/28/08
I used to know a gentleman who was something of a "Ladies' Man."Other than his abilities with women, he was pretty unremarkable. No movie star good looks, no loads of money, and I didn't find him to be particularly bright.
One day I asked him if he would ever consider settling down and getting married. He said, "The key to my success with girls is that I do what comes naturally."
When I asked him what he did, he told me, "I don't know, but whatever it is, it's the secret to what women want."
"Well? What's the secret?"
"Beats me," he said. "It's so secret, not even women know it."
He was either a misunderstood genius or a bum.
Either way, he had - or had the illusion of having - a keen understanding of human relationships. Namely that men, and to a growing extent women, are not monogamous material.
I say monogamy rather than marriage because I think it is important to separate the two into distinct classifications. While we may believe that marriage implies monogamy, the authorities do not support this.
The author of the book "The Monogamy Myth," Peggy Vaughan, said, "Most experts do consider the 'educated guess' that at the present time some 50 to 65 percent of husbands and 45 to 55 percent of wives become extra-maritally involved by the age of 40 to be a relatively sound and reasonable one."
Though exact figures are nearly impossible to pin down given the clandestine characteristics of infidelity, this hypothesis is supported by numerical research and data. But if the institution of marriage has been around for thousands of years, why are we suddenly seeing a spike in infidelity?
More likely than not, we aren't. Societies' outlooks on infidelity over the past millennia have differed widely ranging from the Romans (see Caligula) to the Puritans (see The Scarlet Letter), yet it's always been there.
But if we choose to marry rather than are arranged to marry - and if we think we're choosing monogamy over promiscuity - then why are we statistically prone to cheat?
Conventional wisdom says that men, and apparently women, are pigs. But if that were the case, then why the charade of marrying to begin with? I think a lot of it has to do with the conceptions people have about marriage and who they think they really are in the first place.
First published in 1935 with several subsequent editions published throughout the mid '60s, Drs. Hannah and Abraham Stone's "A Marriage Manual" says, "Men and women may marry for any number of individual reasons. Basically, however, they seek in marriage three main objectives: a stable, permanent association based on mutual affection, on love and companionship; the freedom and privilege of a sexual relationship; and the establishment of a home and a family."
It was true in 1935, and I think it's true enough in 2008.
While our reasons for marrying may be as valid as they were in 1935, our notions regarding what marriage actually is like have changed dramatically. Too many couples nowadays see marriage as the logical conclusion of a courtship, rather than a lifestyle choice that is extremely different from the one they've been living.
By viewing marriage as an extension of their dating era, rather than the beginning of an entirely new one, couples are woefully unprepared for the harsh realities that can set in after eight years - when most first marriages end.
And though our biologically promiscuous nature probably plays a major role in leading people to cheat, it's important to remember our baser instincts are affected deeply by our mental wants and desires. Psychologically, people grow and change all the time. No one reading this now will be the exact same person 10 years from now.
Take me, for example. Years ago, I was a briefs man to the end. Then one morning, I woke up and found them to be tight, constrictive and binding. I switched to boxers and never looked back. Someday I may return to briefs, or maybe boxer-briefs, or maybe swear off underpants all together.
In this way, people can be like underwear. You can grow into them, and you can grow out of them. If you're lucky, you grow with a person, but just as often, you can grow apart. Personally, the idea of waking up next to a woman one morning and realizing I barely know her anymore is almost as scary as knowing up front that she's a horrible person.
One often-cited theory behind infidelity is that one or both parties are simply unhappy or unfulfilled by their spouse. According to his book, "Stumbling on Happiness," Daniel Gilbert says we are poor at predicting what will make us happy.
"When we imagine future circumstances," he says, "we fill in details that won't really come to pass and leave out details that will. When we imagine future feelings, we find it impossible to ignore what we are feeling now and impossible to recognize how we will think about the things that happen later."
So perhaps when we marry, we imagine our lives will be one way when in fact they'll be drastically different - leaving a spouse or marriage to fail to measure up and a mistress or master to come into the picture.
In spite of the reasons for people to cheat, the divorce rate in America isn't as high as most people think - it's actually around 40 percent, not 50 - meaning lots of marriages seem to overcome infidelity. But one way or another, a cheating heart always will tell.
In the film "Moonstruck," an old, married Italian couple sits at the breakfast table when the wife, Rose, says to her husband, Cosmo, "I want you to stop seeing her." Realizing he's been caught, he stands up, slams his hand on the table and calmly says, "OK."
"And go to confession," she says.
Not looking at her, he replies, "A man understands one day that his life is built on nothing. And that is a bad, crazy day."
Rose looks at him and says firmly, "Your life is not built on nothing." And then she says, "Ti amo," and he says, "Ti amo," and all is well.
© Copyright 2008 Daily Toreador

